Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Program Kerja Pengawasan Tahunan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37034/jsisfotek.v2i2.21Keywords:
Annual Supervision Work Program (ASWP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Decision Support System (DSS), Risk-Based Supervision Planning (RBSP), EfficiencyAbstract
The Annual Supervision Work Program (ASWP) is a measure of efficiency and effectiveness in implementing supervision in supporting Inspectorate performance. For the preparation of this ASWP using a Risk-Based Supervision Planning (RBSP) based on certain criteria. Decision Support System (DSS) is a system used to determine alternative ASWP to be implemented. The criteria are determined using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. The basic concept of the SAW method is to find the total weighting of the performance rating for each alternative. Testing is done from ASWP alternative normalized according to the type of attribute criteria (benefit or cost). The final result is obtained from the calculation process, namely from the 10 test data there is 80% compatibility of the data from the system calculation. The sum of the normalized matrix with weights per criterion shows an alternative ranking of the regional apparatus organization that is closest to the criteria to the most distant from the criteria. In order to get an alternative ASWP to be implemented.
References
Sahir, S. H., Rosmawati, R., & Minan, K. (2017). Simple Additive Weighting Method to Determining Employee Salary Increase Rate. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology (IJSRST). 3(8), 42-48.
Mukodimah, S., Muslihudin, M., Andoyo, A., Hartati, S., & Maseleno, A. (2018). Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting and its Application to Toddler Healthy Food. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(7), 1-7.
Setyawan, A., Arini, F. Y., & Akhlis, I. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method and Weighted Product Method to New Employee Recruitment Decision Support System (DSS) at PT. Warta Media Nusantara. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 4(1), 34-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v4i1.8458 .
Krylovas, A., Kosareva, N., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2017). WEBIRA-Comparative Alanysis of Weight Balancing Method. International Journal of Computers Communications and Control, 12(2), 238-253.
Abdullah, L., Adawiyah, C. W. R., & Kamal, C.W. (2018). A Decision Making Method Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: An Approach for Ambulance Location Preference. Applied Computing and Informatics, 14(1), 65-72.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2017.04.003 .
Gothwal, S., & Raj, T. (2017). Priorising the Performance Measures of FMS using Multi-criteria Decision Making Approaches. International Journal Process Management and Benchmarking, 8(1), 59-78.
Hultgren, G., & Eriksson, O. (2003). The notion of Computer Based Information Services. Promote IT, 5-7.
Wanto, A., & Damanik, H. Analisis Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Terhadap Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa BBM (Bantuan Belajar Mahasiswa) Pada Perguruan Tinggi Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus : AMIK Tunas Bangsa Pematangsiantar). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Rekayasa (SNTR) II, 2, 323-333.
